Tuesday, May 27, 2008

McCain: We are Winning the War in Iraq

After watching McCain today, I will say that least he has a good sense of humor. As far as his statement that we are winning the war in Iraq, it reminded me of Gen. Westmoreland's televised speech that we are winning the war in Vietnam shortly before violence levels erupted to new heights during the 1968 Tet Offensive. It's like "the quiet before the storm".

If I know anything about wars, I can personally guarantee that violence levels in Iraq will get much worse long before it ends. The insurgents are likely just preparing for a major attack. Of course, "foreign policy experts" take this as a win. How hilarious.

We can prolong this war for as long as we like, but if I know anything about counterinsurgency and guerrilla warfare, we will never win this war even with the draft re-enacted.

Monday, May 26, 2008

Pat Buchanan: Former Republican Presidential Candidate

Pat Buchanan says, "The Republican Party in Washington DC today are the sort of people we went into politics to run out of town. … We have become what we opposed." 07/07/2005

"the neocons, who are a small cabal, actually, not very many people, insinuated themselves into Bush’s camp, they had allies in Cheney and Rumsfeld, who are not neocons, and then they set this pre-cooked meal in front of the President of the United States, who was an untutored individual in foreign policy… They captured the President, and in so doing they captured the foreign policy, but my own belief is their time is passing." 07/07/2005

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Taking a Break

I'll be taking a break from posting for a while. I am working to pay bills and am taking care of my kids. I'll post occasionally.

Watch McCain's Expertise on Foreign Policy

Video. Watch how clueless McCain is on foreign policy. McCain quickly changes his statements about after being corrected. The funny thing is the person who corrected him is also wrong. It's like the blind leading the blind.

If you want the facts, read the article below on who the Iranians are training:
Iranians Funding Shiite Insurgency

And the reason why Iran is funding them is ... should I really tell anyone ...?? I don't think most people know. The reason is Iran wants a neighboring country than is pro-Iran, much like the U.S. wants its neighbors Canada and Mexico to be friendly towards it. We, the U.S., would be funding wars if Canada or Mexico were under attack to protect our borders. This has nothing to do with radical extremism, which is something that was made up. Iran has a personal interest in protecting in borders. Iran has no reason to trust an Iraqi puppet regime of the U.S., especially after the 1953 incident. Iran has no reason to trust Israel, again due to the 1953 incident. In 1953, the U.S. installed a repressive puppet regime in Iran which killed and tortured their citizens. For Iran's own security, they are funding Shiites in Iraq.

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Documentary: Iraq for Sale: The War Profiteers

Documentary: Iraq for Sale: The War Profiteers

Interesting look at fraudulent business practices of defense contractors and corrupt government officials who fuel them. It also looks at how the CACI contract was listed on the war funding as providing IT support, however they money actually ended up paying CACI for illegal interrogations. The next time Congress passes a War Funding bill, they should realize that money may not be used for what it was authorized for. They should also make stipulation that the money is actually accounted for. Right now the money, U.S. taxpayer dollars, goes into mysterious bank accounts. No one knows where.

Of course, the excuse is, "The bill is to make sure our troops get paid." It is a good selling point but very dishonest. The troops only get a small fraction of it. Most of it goes to paying private defense contractors. It's like saying Johnny the waiter needs to get paid, so the solution of the government is to buy the restaurant chain where Johnny works at. Sure Johnny gets paid, most of the money goes to making the owners becoming rich, Congress members get paid, and it's marketed in the newspapers at "Johnny Gets Paid". A true win for Johnny and the working class .. or not. And the Bill only costs U.S. taxpayers 102 million dollars, what a deal considering that Johnny's weekly pay is about $380.

Billions of dollars in Iraq Funding Unaccounted For

Billions of dollars in Iraq Funding Unaccounted For

It wouldn't be surprising to find the that money is funneling in McCain and Bush's private Cayman Island's bank accounts.

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Peace Efforts in Middle East

Peace Efforts in Middle East. Funny how peace efforts start to happen when McCain and Bush are not involved. I could see how Bush and McCain's involvement can prevent peace in this world.

Documentary: Why We Fight

Why We Fight

An interesting look at American Imperialism. From the rise of the military-industrial complex as warned by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, which I often refer to here as defense contractors, and how it has taken over foreign policy. It covers how the CIA recruited Saddam Hussein and funded by President Reagan, and how he was our ally in the 80's, until he got out of control and wanted more oil, which threatened our supply. A campaign was then made to portray him as the enemy.

A Soldier's Experience of the War Crimes in Iraq

A Soldier's Experience of the War Crimes in Iraq.

"War Heroes"

I think too many outsiders see that when someone has served in the military in a time of war, they are automatically called "War Heroes". Fortunately, the standard is much tougher inside the military. A War Hero is someone who goes above and beyond the call of duty to protect his men, fellow soldiers, and country. It requires courage and bravery to do more than what is required, against many odds, risking one's life in imminent mortal danger . This is an elevated level of risk that is more than is required by fellow soldiers who also have to go to combat. Medals are awarded for such acts of bravery.

A POW on the other hand, is more of a victim's role, unless of course he orchestrated a prison escape, which is not the case here. Being a POW requires mental resolve and toughness, but not necessarily the same kind of courage or bravery. Does he have the courage to do what is right?

Sen. Chuck Hagel

There has been talk that Sen. Chuck Hagel would make a good Vice Presidential candidate for Barack Obama. Perhaps. It all depends on what kinds of voters he can unite together with Barack. I don't know the full discourse of the effects because I don't have the resources to do a national poll. However that being said, I think he will bring discontented Republican voters to unite with Obama.

I haven't done any research on Sen. Chuck Hagel so I don't know what issues and policies he represents. That will determine whether he will be a hinder or help to the Obama camp.

Sen. Chuck Hagel Offering Honest Criticism

Sen. Chuck Hagel Offering Honest Criticism of Presidential Candidate John McCain.

It's a breath of fresh air to hear some honesty in the Republican ranks. I certainly appreciate his candor and integrity. Some analysts were quick to jump to the conclusion to judge his motives to be out of pure selfishness. Maybe, maybe not. It all depends if he thinks he can make a big contribution to the nation.

I think that if most Republicans had the courage to be honest and do what is right, they wouldn't be losing their seats on re-election. People are tired of the Bush-McCain lies and many Independents are smarter than to believe McCain. National poll numbers prove it. The more John McCain lies, the bigger the lead Barack Obama will have.

My personal belief on Sen. Chuck Hagel is that he is a true soldier. There is something taught in the US Army about Honor, Integrity, and Loyalty to one's country that most outsiders just won't understand. This is especially true of soldiers who won many military decorations and honors such as: Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry, Purple Heart, Army Commendation Medal, and the Combat Infantryman Badge. Chuck Hagel is one of those soldiers.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Start a War right before you leave: How Immoral and Irresponsible

CNN: Israel told by White House of immiment plans to attack Iran. Can Bush be impeached, or at a minimum be charged with high treason? Especially when a Declaration of War has not been authorized. Members of Congress need to see this through.

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Some thoughts on the cause of 9/11

Senior CIA Officer who ran the Counterterrorist station on Osama bin Laden speaks.

Book: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror.

Bush Out to Hurt Americans

If you take a look at a number of articles below, you'll see Bush had no interest in protecting the lives of Americans. He knowing let an imminent attack happen on 9/11, only later to justify a huge war budget. He didn't even pretend to act surprised when it did happen. I suspect McCain will let another attack happen, or even fund one indirectly if necessary, in order to justify continual wars. These people are not interested in protecting Americans. Bush want Americans to get hurt in order to justify additional Holy Wars. McCain wants to continue Bush's security/war justification policy.

Articles Detailing Prior Knowledge of 9/11 Attack.

About Iran US Relations

The United States Anti-Democracy Foreign Policy in Iran.

William Blum, author of Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower, on the United States role in torture. "

The notorious Iranian security service, SAVAK, which employed torture routinely, was created under the guidance of the CIA and Israel in the 1950's. According to a former CIA analyst on Iran, Jesse J. Leaf, SAVAK was instructed in torture techniques by the Agency.

After the 1979 revolution, the Iranians found CIA film made for SAVAK on how to torture women."

William Blum on the SAVAK

"The notorious Iranian secret police, SAVAK, created under the guidance of the CIA and Israel, spread its tentacles all over the world to punish Iranian dissidents. According to a former CIA analyst on Iran, SAVAK was instructed in torture techniques by the Agency. Amnesty International summed up the situation in 1976 by noting that Iran had the "highest rate of death penalties in the world, no valid system of civilian courts and a history of torture which is beyond belief. No country in the world has a worse record in human rights than Iran."

"When to this is added a level of corruption that "startled even the most hardened observers of Middle Eastern thievery", it is understandable that the Shah needed his huge military and police force, maintained by unusually large US aid and training programs, to keep the lid down for as long as he did."

Iraq is Bush's Holy War

President Bush inciting Biblical Context for War
Article 2.

Sen. John McCain to continue Bush's Holy War creating Islamic Jihad creating World War III, world chaos and destruction.

Israel and Palestine

The Jews and Muslims have been at war with each since the Holy Crusades and a little before that, if my memory serves me correctly. Though admittedly, my memory is getting rusty. :) Both sides are very aggressive towards each other. Both sides have done "terrorist tactics" towards each other. Personally I don't see this war ending. And don't see why the US has to get in the middle of it with American lives. If Israel needs military equipment, we can sell it to them, as we have been. The only way to end this war is for the US to totally wipe out the Palestinians completely, including killing all innocent civilians. I don't see how we even have the capability or moral right to do so. The US won't be able to wipe out an entire race anymore than Hitler was able to do so and even if we tried, the world would be totally against us for killing innocent civilians. And of course, there will be some survivors and retribution (ie. heightened terrorist attacks) against the Americans for the next one thousand years, or eternity, whichever comes last. Another problem though, is that due to their violent religion (not unlike the Christian Old Testament), the innocent civilians would one day continue the task. The war between Israel and Palestine will continue for the next thousand years. Us jumping in the middle will not end the conflict. Just leave it be, unless of course you want to send your own children out there to fight and only your children. Do not put other people's children in harm's way.

These wars have a religious undertone to them, fighting for the Holy City of Jerusalem. Religion is suppose to bring spirituality and enlightenment, but instead it is practiced as death and destruction. Funny that Islamic and Jewish Bibles from the time until Abraham are about the same God. They are supposed to be brothers, but instead kill each other.

This begs the question: is religion inherently evil? Looking at all the destruction and wars it has caused. Christianity is included in this list. Just look at the Holy Crusades, and as recent as the Iraq War. Bush: God told me to invade Iraq. On President Bush's speeches leading up to the invasion of Iraq, he mentions God, destroying evil and it moved many Christians to agree ... initially. People use religion to start wars all the time, Christianity included.

The most important question though is: Can the United States come up with a plan that will bring a permanent end to this conflict? Most likely not.

Saturday, May 17, 2008

Schools and Racism

While there is some racism among blue collared whites, the most racism I experienced were with black people. It is amazing growing up in a black neighborhood and going to black schools how they constantly talked about the white man not giving them chances and easily claim racism, but being an Asian, I remember being treated pretty badly by blacks because of my race. While I was in a magnet vanguard program from grades 6-12, this was at a public school that had to coexist with regular school program. I had to attend the regular program classes for electives and physical education. While in the magnet program, I was treated fairly well and got along fine, every time I went to the regular classes, which were primarily black, they would find a reason to pick on my because of my race. I had to take martial arts at an early age for fear of my physical safety. Even then, when a black kid attacked me and I started to win, the other black kids would step in and stop the fight. However in the first minute of the fight, when I was losing, no one bothered to step in. Amazing.

When I worked in high school at Wendy's. The laziest people were the black people, they constantly complained about every little thing, and did the least work. It is amazing to see.

When I went to basic training in the Army, we had to wake up in the middle of the night to do security duty. After my turn was up, I had to wake up the next person to be on duty. Whenever it was a black person, they would not want to wake up and make excuses. I've never had this problem with anyone else. I wasn't allowed to be off duty until they woke up. They took their sweet time and were the slowest.

My parents still live in the same black neighborhood that I grew up in. Usually when I go there, there would be some black people driving next to me and making fun of me for my race. These were more often females than males.

I had to get this off my chest, as this was the environment I grew up in. If black people want to be respected, they need to treat others with respect. They also need to develop a good work ethic. They are the first to make claims of racism, and they are also the first to perpetuate racism when given the opportunity.

While I had good experiences with college educated blacks, when I had joined a small growing black church, the blue collar blacks are the most racist I have ever met. Even when I worked in the states with predominant blue collar whites, I wasn't treated poorly.

As far as maturity and development goes, the blue collared white people have matured much further.

Oh I forgot one of the reasons why I wanted to post, people ask for more money for the poor schools but my experience has been that when attending classes in the regular school, the students are very unruly and the teacher often has problems controlling the class. More books, and more money, won't make much difference, as these students are determined in class to jack around. They are not there for learning. They don't care about an education. In my experience, teachers can't control the students in the poor schools. Until that is resolved, and the students actually want to study, more money is a waste of resources.

I took 2 years of high school Spanish in the regular school. One of the black students was constantly goofing around in class and would not study during study time. At the end of the 2 years, the teacher asked him if he had learned anything, he responded, "Si". She asked if that is all he learned, he responded, "Si". While the guy was trying to be funny, and I actually liked him, he learned very little. I don't consider him to be unruly. I thought he was more of the class comedian. Very funny, but did little school work. He may even be a very successful comedian now. Who knows. Quite charismatic. The point is, under the same teacher, textbooks, and conditions, I had managed to learn quite a bit of Spanish while some didn't. It is really up to the student during study time, to study. The teacher constantly threatened to fail students who didn't study and got low grades, as a result, but she had a kind heart underneath and didn't fail anyone. She now teaches at a prestigious private school. I guess she had enough of students who weren't interested.

Students now graduate without learning to read because they don't want to. You can't blame the teachers for that. They actually try to teach, but it is up to the student if he wants to learn.

I support more money for the public magnet schools, which exist in poor neighborhoods too. I went to them. I should know. In the magnet schools, students are serious about their education and they deserve good materials. Students who are interested in a better education should apply for the magnet program. Learning to read is something that is up to the student and more money will not help.

And yes, even in the magnet program, a number of teachers were asses. Though there were some good teachers, I will always remember, who sparked my imagination and creativity.

McCain on Wars

McCain on War. Interesting that McCain addressing the crowd said, "[if elected President] ... I'm going to be asking you to serve". Interesting. Is he planning to institute the draft again? How does McCain plan to have the manpower to support all these wars?

A look at Reality and McCain

Let's look at John McCain's record on Veterans.

Republicans Red Herring Approach

Republicans, especially W. Bush and McCain, are using fear as a red herring technique to distract people from knowing the real issues. They don't want people to know what they are doing, conducting criminal activities in foreign countries through covert operations, continuing necessary wars, etc. Gen. Colin Powell has said that the war in Iraq is a revolutionary war. To distract from reality, the Republicans keep saying we have to win in Iraq to beat the terrorists to or we suffer doom. The two are a non-sequiter. The real issue is: Why are we still in Iraq? Well for one, it definitely benefits Dick Cheney's company, Halliburton, which is the primary contractor for logistical support (which is huge amount of money).

During the Vietnam War, it was said that if we lose this war, the communists will take over the world and we will certainly perish. Well, we lost the Vietnam War, and none of that has happened. Now that communism isn't much of a threat, the have to invent new enemies to justify huge budgets for wars, mostly paid to defense contractors. The new enemy are "terrorists". The U.S. Army Field Manual No. FM 3-0, Chapter 9, 37, 14 June 2001, defines terrorism as "calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear. It is intended to coerce or intimidate governments or societies ... [to attain] political, religious, or ideological goals." By all accounts, this is an exacting description of George W. Bush's foreign policies, which John McCain now backs. According to the US Army then, we are a state sponsored terrorist organization, subverting foreign governments through the CIA at first, and then escalating it to full-scale war then that doesn't work. People may think I am being funny, however I spoke with a number of US citizens who reside overseas in these or nearby countries, and they say they get verbally accosted because the local citizens know they are Americans. They view the US as terrorists, and that is a statement of fact. In order to stop foreign countries from retaliating with their attacks, we need to stop these wars and repair our image. The current Bush foreign policy is only making it worse for us.

We need someone who will help repair our image and improve diplomatic relations.

Friday, May 16, 2008

Buzzwords

During the cold war, the scare tactic buzzword for people to stop any rational thinking was communist. Today it is 'terrorist'. When Republicans have no way to explain their acts of aggression and murder, they call everyone that disagrees as supporting terrorism. It used to be called pro-communism.

Interesting idea about the no talk policy of McCain and W. Bush, when Reagan himself sat right next to a communist state supreme premier Mikhail Gorbachev. Amazing what one can achieve by discussion. Due to their talks, which resulted in friendly relationships with the USSR, we are no longer in a Cold War with them.

Bush and McCain do not want to sit down and discuss with 'the enemy'. It provides for an excuse for continuing the war, of course to make themselves richer. McCain is used to a nice rich life thanks to his wife. Besides he wants to prove to her he can make more money, by defense contractors offering him money in unnamed offshore accounts.

Common sense would dictate that talking to the other side would be the first step in resolving a conflict. It resulted in the end of the Cold War. I seriously question McCain's leadership and judgment. We would be in bigger, and bigger wars with him in place. Anyone he doesn't like, he just starts wars with ... no end in sight ... just bomb, anyone and everyone, and of course a bomb will hit us in response on U.S. soil. Who are we to blame if we elect him?

Say 'No' to War Candidates

Daniel Ellsberg, man who released Pentagon Papers.

Nixon and McCain

In 1968, when Nixon ran for the Presidency of the United States, he said, "I pledge to you, we will have an honorable end to the war in Vietnam," as part of his campaign. Of course he was the one who, when elected Preident, secretly bombed Cambodia killing countless civilians, and made the country vulnerable to the Khmer Rouger who later killed 2 million civilians.

Are we seeing a repeat?

Nixon also ordered a host of illegal wiretaps on citizens of this country, not unlike today.

Thursday, May 15, 2008

President Bush takes no responsibility for his actions

Article. Who started this war again knowingly presenting false information? He takes no responsibility for his actions. We'll likely see the same from McCain "stay the course ... I have no plan but high hopes based on pure fantasy after drinking beer."

McCain has NO IDEA how to write a military plan

Drug Inducted Prediction. Oh My Goodness! John McCain has no idea how to write a military plan to win a war and he spent 20 years in the military? I honestly thought McCain was more qualified than that. And this guy wants to run the country now? Say your prayers.

McCain's Prediction

Sen. McCain's Prediction. I wonder what this prediction is based on?? Fantasy. Likely. It is also convenient that the date is 2013 and the next presidential term ends 2012. Very convenient. Either way, he won't be responsible for what happens. It doubtful he has a real plan for winning the war, like how does he plan to stop Iran from funding soldiers and equipment for the war? We can't even win a full-scale war against Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan right now. I used to know a person who constantly made promises with specific deadlines with no idea about how to go about it. There are delusional and often lead people in the depths of hell.

If we stop creating wars in other countries, maybe people will leave us alone. Now that is a great plan compared to all the resentment towards the US for creating wars in numerous other countries, first through the CIA under the direction of the President, and killing millions of innocent civilians not even to better the country, but purely to serve the interests of the US. Remember the Killing Fields and Cambodia, how the US ousted, through a CIA backed coup, of the very popular leader Prince Sihanouk, leading to countless deaths by other parties who tried to regain power. You really think citizens of those countries don't have anything against us? What if most of your family including children were blown up by the US government and you were the only that survived? Wouldn't you be angry? Prince Sihanouk was very good for his country. Unfortunately, he pointed out the covert and immoral tactics of the US, and Nixon's bombing of his people. This made bad press for the US, so that had to get rid of him. It hurt his country and his people badly, and did not help the US win the Vietnam War as promised. We did the same thing with Iran. Why do you think there is retribution now?

Most of these wars are unnecessary and unjustified. They are acts of aggression from the United States and they need to be stopped. W. Bush should be tried as a war criminal, along with anyone who continues that war.

What Bush calls terrorists are often people seeking retribution for the criminals acts of the US in foreign countries.

What we need is to come to so kind of truce with them. That we refrain from conducting criminal activities in those countries, in exchange for them leaving us alone. That is what real peace is about.

Sunday, May 11, 2008

The Suffering of Soldiers

New York Times article. It's funny that the excuse by this Republicans is that these things are too costly. That is, it costs a lot to care for our soldiers, so we rather discourage them from seeking treatment, by giving on some treatment. The funny thing is that the cost of treating our soldiers is only a small percentage of the cost of funding the war, while the bulk of it goes to feeding the rich defense contractors. Yet the Republicans and John McCain still push for the war but not for the treatment of soldiers. I think it shows their true colors.

People often think that men of the military are all honorable. That is the common misperception from outsiders. I've been screwed over a number of times by ex-Marines who served in Iraq, one who was a construction manager for KB Home and one who as the Sales Manager. They went beyond lying and into the realm of fraud in what they did.

There are some good people in the military and there are some bad. Just don't assume all military men are of honor. I was recently watching tapes of torture sessions done by the Americans during the Vietnam war. I couldn't believe all the things the US were doing ... which broke the 1949 Geneva Conventions agreement on treatment of prisoners of war. It made McCain's POW treatment look like a cake walk.

I was very sad and ashamed of America's conduct in the war. And now there's Iraq.

Saturday, May 10, 2008

They vote for her because of her gender

Article. It doesn't matter what the political issues are or even ethics, as long as it is their race or their sex. Certain types of voters vote this way.

Thursday, May 08, 2008

Appealing to blue collar whites

From news reports, it says that blue collar whites do not vote for Obama. Early in my career, I had lived far from my hometown to work in jobs I found to be exciting at the time. To save on costs, I rented rooms from these people, who happen to be blue collar whites. I learned a lot of things. The particular guy I had rented a room from was 3-5 years older than me. He seemed like a real cool fun guy to hang with. We often hung out and joked around. Had lots of fun. He was a very mentally tough guy. He was about 40+ more pounds than me, mostly muscle. It seemed surprising that we would get along but we often man-wrestled (red-neck style) and I would always beat him usually in a very intense few moments, overpowering his strength with skill. This is no exaggeration and 100% true. I got his respect early on, so we got along very well. I had trained in the practical portions of martial arts most of my life with over 1,000 hours in many forms of combat sparring. I was used to fighting people much more skilled during practice, but I was in a part of the country I didn't know much about. We both enjoyed it. It was a manly thing to do.

Only later on, did I find out that he worked in an environment full of racism and machismo, which is typical for blue collar whites. He would tell me how racist his coworkers and especially his bosses were. They really would never vote for a black man, out of pure racism, and how they would appear to their peers if they did. They wouldn't vote for a woman either but if given the choice, they would choose a woman over a black man. He also belonged to a union, who told him how to think and behave. It was strange, because it felt like I didn't know this guy anymore.

How do you appeal to racist people? Well the most important thing to him was his job, and the union which protected it. They hated foreign workers, who they say steal their jobs. To appeal to these people, who are racist with a big factor due to reasons of job security, you would would have to show that you will protect his job from foreign workers. By not allowing illegal immigration, not increasing the number of H1 visas , and guaranteeing that the jobs will remain in the U.S., I believe you can appeal to these people. Their job security, income, and therefore their livelihood, is the number one thing they care about. I believe they will overcome the race issue, if the upcoming president can guarantee jobs remain in the U.S. On another strategic level, to get with the union bosses and chiefs, and guarantee them their jobs are protected. The union chiefs tell the blue collar whites how to think. If you get them on your side, you have the votes of the blue collar whites. Talk with a bit of testosterone, as that is normal mode of communication with them. They will not listen to calm, educated talk. Their care about the bottom line, so be direct, and get to the point.

Racism is often due to fear. Overcome their fear and you have their support.

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

Obama

Obama. I think that Obama will not only win the Democratic nomination but also the US Presidency as well. But there is a lot of work to do.