Washington Post.
Read how the U.S. Government Accountability Office's (GAO) September 2005 report states that
-- CounterPunch* Some voting machines did not encrypt cast ballots or system audit logs, and it was possible to alter both without being detected.
* It was possible to alter the machines so that a ballot cast for one candidate would be recorded for another.
* Vendors installed uncertified versions of voting system software at the local level.
* Access was easily compromised and did not require a widespread conspiracy. A small handful of people is sufficient to steal an election.
No comments:
Post a Comment