If you have painful memories you would like to be erased, Western Science always has a promising cure for you, regardless of the problems you may have. Let's take a look at one such approach.
ECT Video. It works but yes there's always some side effects with Western Medicine.
Thursday, April 09, 2009
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Capitalism vs. Communism: The Realities of Corporate America
It seems that most Americans are so proud of capitalism and shun communism as it if is some evil entity, usually without understanding much about either. Welcome to America. These are Americans.
In corporate America, one IT developer could be carrying the weight of most of the team, yet his pay plus bonuses is only maybe 2,000 - 5,000 more per year. This kind of communistic strategy hardly motivates top talent to deliver. The productivity of some developers are at a rate of 10 to 1 to many of his peers in the company. Yet his pay is only marginally higher. Why work so hard when everyone else is deadweight? Many CIOs refuse to reward their top talent much more than that because "they don't want to upset everyone". Yet the CIO himself takes home himself a big bonus plus promotions that year for the work of that single person, the highly talented person. Not only is this person's productivity 10 to 1 but he is able to produce things the 10 others are not able to produce and move the company into a new area.
It seems the reward strategy for most companies in corporate America is based on communism. Basically you get the same regardless of what you do. The exception of course are the executives. They seem to take some millions more for failing everyone else. By pulling back hand deals and corrupt practices, they seem to take all the money and glory of some of the top talent who work underneath them. Hardly seems unfair. Is this capitalism or a form of tyranny seen in communistic countries.
It seems to me the best strategy for a highly talented person in America is to work in a communistic way because corporate America is based on communism.
In corporate America, one IT developer could be carrying the weight of most of the team, yet his pay plus bonuses is only maybe 2,000 - 5,000 more per year. This kind of communistic strategy hardly motivates top talent to deliver. The productivity of some developers are at a rate of 10 to 1 to many of his peers in the company. Yet his pay is only marginally higher. Why work so hard when everyone else is deadweight? Many CIOs refuse to reward their top talent much more than that because "they don't want to upset everyone". Yet the CIO himself takes home himself a big bonus plus promotions that year for the work of that single person, the highly talented person. Not only is this person's productivity 10 to 1 but he is able to produce things the 10 others are not able to produce and move the company into a new area.
It seems the reward strategy for most companies in corporate America is based on communism. Basically you get the same regardless of what you do. The exception of course are the executives. They seem to take some millions more for failing everyone else. By pulling back hand deals and corrupt practices, they seem to take all the money and glory of some of the top talent who work underneath them. Hardly seems unfair. Is this capitalism or a form of tyranny seen in communistic countries.
It seems to me the best strategy for a highly talented person in America is to work in a communistic way because corporate America is based on communism.
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Domestic Violence
Looking at Oprah's list of warning signs, I can say my ex-wife treated me that way. I recorded all the phone messages she left me and all the names and phony charges she accused me off. Usually 10-20 messages in a day when she is on her bipolar tirade. Hmm. I'm sure a judge would be interested in hearing that.
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Ex
While we were married, my ex-wife wanted me to shoot her 1st husband. It's kind of contradictory in that she is very much against guns, gun ownership, but wanted me to shoot someone for her. I refused but she kept on pressuring me constantly to do. I told her, "Why don't you do it?" She said, "No". And insisted that I do it. I said I had nothing against him, why would I want to kill him. She said, "Do it for me". "No thank you". She lost custody of her first son and wanted me to kill her 1st husband, so she could have the child. Of course she wanted no part of the dirty work knowing that the shooter would likely be arrested. She kept on pressuring me until I told her first husband about it ... at which point, she insisted she never said such a thing and told me to never contact him again.
Is she innocent or just wanted her hands clean of any dirty work? Did she really love me like she repeatedly profess or just trying to use me and have me take all the consequences? I'd think that if you'd love someone, you'd want the best for them long-term and not for them to end up in jail.
It's also kind of funny that she often "joked to death due us part" making a pistol with her hand and shooting at my head. She said there'd only be one way for us to be separated. It was funny the first couple of times, but she kept on repeating every time I told her I wanted a divorce. Coincidentally, during the divorce, she repeated asked me to sign a will that in the event she and I both died at the same time (real likely since we were separated), to give the parental rights of the kids to so and so. I said, "How is it likely that we will both die at the same time (we don't even live together)?" She responded "just in case". She has been clinically diagnosed by a state psychiatrist as "bipolar with homocidal tendencies". It's weird that she thinks we could die at the same time. I had no idea what she had in mind. I never signed it and am still alive today.
Is she innocent or just wanted her hands clean of any dirty work? Did she really love me like she repeatedly profess or just trying to use me and have me take all the consequences? I'd think that if you'd love someone, you'd want the best for them long-term and not for them to end up in jail.
It's also kind of funny that she often "joked to death due us part" making a pistol with her hand and shooting at my head. She said there'd only be one way for us to be separated. It was funny the first couple of times, but she kept on repeating every time I told her I wanted a divorce. Coincidentally, during the divorce, she repeated asked me to sign a will that in the event she and I both died at the same time (real likely since we were separated), to give the parental rights of the kids to so and so. I said, "How is it likely that we will both die at the same time (we don't even live together)?" She responded "just in case". She has been clinically diagnosed by a state psychiatrist as "bipolar with homocidal tendencies". It's weird that she thinks we could die at the same time. I had no idea what she had in mind. I never signed it and am still alive today.
Women have different ways of taking revenge
While this was one person's way of taking revenge, women have their own ways of taking revenge in a much more brutal long term effect. This particular guy's revenge was pretty short, women on the other hand will suck every dollar out of you for the rest of your life, they will take your kids away from you, and make you into a living zombie for the rest of your life. Who is more cruel?
In other news, the media often reports war casualties of dead men, but make a big deal when women and children are killed. It's as if it's okay to kill men, but women and children are off limits. Women are not pacifists. They have their own ways of doing evil that is not so obvious to report. As a kid, I was picked on by many other kids, mainly because I was the only Asian in the school. Kids can be very mean, and cruel, so they are hardly innocent by any standard.
Women like to portray themselves as helpless and innocent with no power but in reality do not most women "control" the household in America? Some say the Nancy Reagan was the one who really ran things and not President Reagan. He had to do everything according to how she forecasted "the stars"? Are they really helpless when they complain and lie to their male sympathizers to get stuff done for them ( or kick another guy's ass)?
Portraying themselves as helpless victims is just a political maneuver to gain even more subtle power over men (who they often consider stupid and easy to manipulate). These same men will go on "crusades" for more power to the women. *yawn*
In other news, the media often reports war casualties of dead men, but make a big deal when women and children are killed. It's as if it's okay to kill men, but women and children are off limits. Women are not pacifists. They have their own ways of doing evil that is not so obvious to report. As a kid, I was picked on by many other kids, mainly because I was the only Asian in the school. Kids can be very mean, and cruel, so they are hardly innocent by any standard.
Women like to portray themselves as helpless and innocent with no power but in reality do not most women "control" the household in America? Some say the Nancy Reagan was the one who really ran things and not President Reagan. He had to do everything according to how she forecasted "the stars"? Are they really helpless when they complain and lie to their male sympathizers to get stuff done for them ( or kick another guy's ass)?
Portraying themselves as helpless victims is just a political maneuver to gain even more subtle power over men (who they often consider stupid and easy to manipulate). These same men will go on "crusades" for more power to the women. *yawn*
Monday, March 02, 2009
NJ/NYC Area
I recently relocated to the NJ/NYC. Kinda fun today with all the snow and shoveling. It beats a hot Texas summer. The lady I am renting my room from is a very nice lady. It can seem that all women are evil during and after a divorce. Women can be so nice. They are a little moody at times but I think it is all just part of the fun. he he he
Thursday, February 26, 2009
War Crimes Trial
Article. It looks like Milosec died of a heart attack before he could be found guilty. Maybe former Pres. Bush would suffer the same fate. Hmm.. We need to put Bush on trial for his war crimes, have the details of what he did read to him, and victims testify in front of him.
Monday, February 23, 2009
Army charity hoards millions
Army charity hoards millions. No surprise here. I know how charities really operate. That's why I don't give to charities or "non-profit" organizations.
Fraud Alert: vault.com
Beware of vault.com. Long after you cancel your membership, they keep charging you 49.95.
So many despicable business practices out there. They are hoping a certain percentage don't notice or take the time to call, so they still make a profit. A lot of companies are now using scam practices to get more money since the economy is down.
They do not have a number you can call. So you have to scan through their website to figure out the email address to contact. Another scam technique ... charging people but not listing obvious ways to cancel. One has to take the time to comb through the website and figure it out. Finally, there is a web form for submitting a question. Let's hope they bother answering those.
Update: I got an email response back saying they refuse to refund me but will reduce the charges by 25%. It is signed by an anonymous pseudonym. No real name is provided. Their claim is that I never canceled. The cancel button on their membership site obviously doesn't work for obvious reasons.
So many despicable business practices out there. They are hoping a certain percentage don't notice or take the time to call, so they still make a profit. A lot of companies are now using scam practices to get more money since the economy is down.
They do not have a number you can call. So you have to scan through their website to figure out the email address to contact. Another scam technique ... charging people but not listing obvious ways to cancel. One has to take the time to comb through the website and figure it out. Finally, there is a web form for submitting a question. Let's hope they bother answering those.
Update: I got an email response back saying they refuse to refund me but will reduce the charges by 25%. It is signed by an anonymous pseudonym. No real name is provided. Their claim is that I never canceled. The cancel button on their membership site obviously doesn't work for obvious reasons.
Monday, February 16, 2009
Republican Losers show their True Colors
The Republican Losers want a perjury probe of Sen. Burris but are against a probe of former Pres. Bush. What a bunch of hypocrites.
They also created the $700 financial bailout without any restrictions but were adamant in placing a ton of restrictions on US auto workers. These liars are worthless human beings.
They also created the $700 financial bailout without any restrictions but were adamant in placing a ton of restrictions on US auto workers. These liars are worthless human beings.
Monday, February 09, 2009
Sunday, February 08, 2009
This sucks! An innocent man's life is ruined.
Video. This woman pinpointed the wrong man as her attacker and showed no remorse for her mistake. She ruined his life. Being a good person and faith in G*d isn't enough to survive in this world when there are agents of the devil, i.e. prosecutor, working. The prosecutor ignored real evidence because he/she is just pure evil. The prosecutor should be prosecuted for this. Of course we don't see this happen, because the system is a failure. The system of justice is a fraud, where few in the system care about real justice. It's like "oh well, next case please." Earn the paycheck.
Saturday, February 07, 2009
Thursday, February 05, 2009
Bill Gates
Picture. He's been looking pretty stressed out ever since he got married. He used to be such the happy person.
Monday, January 26, 2009
Google Layoffs: 10,000
Yay! What a bunch of losers. Imagine being interviewed by a bunch of people severely less skilled than you. They pass you on the interview because you can't remember definitions you once knew 20+ years ago. They just learned things I knew 20 years ago, and think they are the smartest people in the world. Serves them right for their big losses.
They like to hire Ivy League degrees. It's no wonder they have to lay off so many.
They like to hire Ivy League degrees. It's no wonder they have to lay off so many.
Thursday, January 22, 2009
low-tech White House
The Secret Service and NSA are so low tech. It's so easy to disguise the source location of the email or phone call but they don't have the technology in the world to do it. Just all the expert hackers know how to do it and many not so expert.
Obama needs to get real experts in there quick.
Obama needs to get real experts in there quick.
Bush
It's time for former Pres. Bush to pay for his crimes against humanity especially against that of the people of the United States of America. You cannot be soft on crime and let his deeds go unpunished. What does that say when you do? Why are normal citizens prosecuted for the crimes in the past but ex-Presidents not?? It speaks of an unfair system.
Of course Bush was nice to Obama after he became President-Elect and helped him with many things. Why would Bush piss off a new President when he knows he could easily go to jail for what he did? Of course he is going to try to smooth things over. If a criminal saw an opportunity to free of himself of the penalities of past crimes by just being nice to somebody for a few months, why would he not be helpful? Some people are more gullible than others.
I hope the right thing is done regarding Pres. Bush crimes. He is not repentent, only playing someone for a fool. If the Va. Tech murderer suddently became repentent, should we just let him go because it is the past? Who is going to pay for the life lost? Who is going to pay for the lives lost in Iraq??
Of course Bush was nice to Obama after he became President-Elect and helped him with many things. Why would Bush piss off a new President when he knows he could easily go to jail for what he did? Of course he is going to try to smooth things over. If a criminal saw an opportunity to free of himself of the penalities of past crimes by just being nice to somebody for a few months, why would he not be helpful? Some people are more gullible than others.
I hope the right thing is done regarding Pres. Bush crimes. He is not repentent, only playing someone for a fool. If the Va. Tech murderer suddently became repentent, should we just let him go because it is the past? Who is going to pay for the life lost? Who is going to pay for the lives lost in Iraq??
Happiness
I look around and notice that I've been the happiest than I've been in a long, long time. I notice what is different now than was before and remember that my divorce was finalized a few weeks ago. Being with the wrong person can traumatize you. Luckily, that was only a temporary part of my life.
Life is Good.
Life is Good.
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)